<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REALbasic Beta Program Survey Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bkeeneybriefs.com/2010/01/realbasic-beta-program-survey-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bkeeneybriefs.com/2010/01/realbasic-beta-program-survey-results/</link>
	<description>Software Development Using REALbasic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 03:16:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Keeney</title>
		<link>http://www.bkeeneybriefs.com/2010/01/realbasic-beta-program-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Keeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bkeeneybriefs.com/?p=547#comment-173</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-172&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Phillip Zedalis &lt;/a&gt; 
Yeah, I prefer the forum idea myself but some of the old-timers would have a fit.  If you remember they tried to do away with the NUG mailing list and some of the old-timers threatened to leave RB altogether.

I switched to digest mode soon after getting into the program and even then I can still get 5 or 6 digest emails per day.  It *can* be overwhelming.

I disagree with your assessment, though, of the beta program.  They do ask long term questions not directly related to the next release.  For example, they asked pointed questions about reporting and the EditField split a couple of releases out so they could start preparing for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-172" rel="nofollow">@Phillip Zedalis </a><br />
Yeah, I prefer the forum idea myself but some of the old-timers would have a fit.  If you remember they tried to do away with the NUG mailing list and some of the old-timers threatened to leave RB altogether.</p>
<p>I switched to digest mode soon after getting into the program and even then I can still get 5 or 6 digest emails per day.  It *can* be overwhelming.</p>
<p>I disagree with your assessment, though, of the beta program.  They do ask long term questions not directly related to the next release.  For example, they asked pointed questions about reporting and the EditField split a couple of releases out so they could start preparing for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Zedalis</title>
		<link>http://www.bkeeneybriefs.com/2010/01/realbasic-beta-program-survey-results/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Zedalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bkeeneybriefs.com/?p=547#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I signed up for it, then promptly signed off of it when I was getting flooded with emails and I had no context for what the conversations were about.  A beta discussion forum of some kind might be more helpful than an old style mailing list.  

Secondly with a release schedule as often as realbasic&#039;s I question whether the beta cycle has much bearing aside from being free software testing for them...  I highly doubt any beta feedback outside of bugs is seriously considered and wedged into the project timeline before release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up for it, then promptly signed off of it when I was getting flooded with emails and I had no context for what the conversations were about.  A beta discussion forum of some kind might be more helpful than an old style mailing list.  </p>
<p>Secondly with a release schedule as often as realbasic&#8217;s I question whether the beta cycle has much bearing aside from being free software testing for them&#8230;  I highly doubt any beta feedback outside of bugs is seriously considered and wedged into the project timeline before release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
