REALbasic
Looking At MySQL Again
25/06/08 13:17
I installed MySQL 5.0.x Community Edition the other
day to test something out and I have to admit that
I’m impressed with where the database has come since
the last time I looked at it (which was around
version 3!). Read
More...
|
HTMLViewer Replacement
14/06/08 14:35
HTMLViewer for REALbasic has some pretty nasty flaws.
In conversations with many people over the past year,
I think it’s safe to say that HTMLViewer was
introduced to satisfy some particular need for Real
Software. Perhaps that’s the new Language Reference.
However, I also think it’s safe to say that we, as
developers, are using it in ways that RS didn’t
intend (though why the heck they thought we would use
it this way is beyond me).
Read More...
Read More...
Nice To See That They're Asking
20/05/08 12:30
Real Software engineer, Nathan, posted an item on the
NUG list today that I find most interesting and
heartening. They asked people who use RBScript to
take a survey. That's pretty interesting.
Read More...
Read More...
Err.Stack Isn't Guaranteed To Be Accurate
13/05/08 22:01
I ran across an issue the other day where I was
testing throwing an exception. Yes! I was actually
throwing an exception on purpose and testing it in
Mac OS X and in Windows XP and checking to make sure
my error reporting tools were working properly. On
Windows the err.stack array contained the function
where the exception occurred without fail. On Mac OS
X, however, the stack array only showed the functions
before the exception occurred.
Read More...
Read More...
What The Hell Were They Thinking?
24/04/08 00:01
Real Software scares me sometimes. This week they
told us they were switching to FogBugz as their new
bug tracking system. I think that's awesome! But then
they said that the old feedback system was being
shutdown and no longer available and oh, by the way,
the new system isn't searchable. Talk about a
sh**storm. I have to file this one under the "What
the Hell Were They Thinking!?" category.
Read More...
Read More...
Is REALbasic a Good Name?
14/04/08 17:47
In the grand scheme of things, a name doesn't mean
much but as we've seen with Apple and Microsoft
operating systems, a name gives 'meaning' to a
product. There are a lot of people that, when hearing
the word 'basic' in reference to programming, think
of the bad old days where you numbered each line of
code and it was interpreted (i.e. slow). They think
of QBasic or GW-basic! Didn't they die with DOS?
Read More...
Read More...
Mars Leaving
02/04/08 10:00
Real World Recap
25/03/08 15:22
It was a busy week at
Real World. The density of REALbasic developers is
never higher than at Real World so it's natural that
all conversations revolve around REALbasic. So here
are some of my observations. Read
More...
Real World Bound
13/03/08 17:02
Real World is next
week! I'm excited about all the things that are going
on, learning some new things about REALbasic and
exchanging ideas and information. That's in addition
to renewing old friendships and starting some new
ones. All-in-all, I think I'll be lucky to have my
voice by the end of the week. Read
More...
StyledText
04/03/08 19:15
I'd like to welcome BKeeney Software engineer Seth
Verrinder to the BKeeney Briefs blog. Seth recently
discovered a few issues relating to StyledText class
in REALbasic. Here are his observations....
Read More...
Read More...
Wish List: 'Registered' Plugins
12/02/08 21:57
I've been pondering why the 3rd party plugin and
controls market isn't bigger for REALbasic. Certainly
part of the barrier to entry is the size of the
market. Part of it is RS' reluctance to actively
promote the 3rd party solutions. Another barrier to
entry is that the existing plugins are so inexpensive
that it's tough for a new competitor to enter the
space dominated by MonkeyBread and Einhugur (both of
which we own and use and highly recommend).
Read
More...
Wish List: Compiler Warnings
09/02/08 13:55
By this point everyone knows that REALbasic is
deprecating a lot of "lesser used" technologies. I
don't have any issue with this whatsoever but it has
become increasingly apparent that RS isn't doing a
good job of telling us about these changes. Does
anyone bother to read the release notes? It doesn't
really matter in my opinion. The compiler should be
warning us because that's the job of the compiler.
Read
More...
We Are Not The Only Ones
05/02/08 18:23
I ran across this blog entry dated November,
2005 from a supposed Microsoft Employee talking
about Visual Studio 2005. Read
More...
Do Apple and Microsoft Really Care about REALbasic?
03/02/08 14:57
Let's play CEO for a minute and pretend that we're
Steve Jobs who takes (and probably deserves) the
credit for a successful Apple turnaround. In a minute
we'll also pretend that we're Steve Ballmer who is at
the helm of the most dominate software company in the
history of computing. Do you really think either one
of them cares about REALbasic and REAL Software?
Read
More...
Why Join A Professional Association for RB?
19/01/08 17:21
It seems that the idea of having a professional
association for REALbasic has some legs. Many people
have left messages and contacted me privately
offering their support and giving us some ideas...
Read More...
Read More...
Is It Time For a Professional Association?
09/01/08 14:39
An interesting conversation started on Norman Palardy's blog the
other day. Norman was taking about he wished
there was better mechanism in place to help
prioritize bugs and enhancement requests. It
started off with a general rant (my words not
his) about the feedback system not being
exceptionally useful with some suggestions on
how to make it better. It then wandered off (my
fault - my bad) about how it would be nice to
survey the beta participants to let RS know what
we feel which enhancements are more important.
Read More...
Read More...
Enhancing the Language Reference
24/12/07 10:57
For the past couple of weeks I've been talking about
things I'd like to see in REALbasic and what, I think
we, as users, can do for REALbasic. The comments have
been great - I appreciate all the time and effort all
of you have put into them. I think I've settled upon
one thing that I'd like to see changed in REALbasic.
The Language Reference in RB is, depending upon who you ask, is either barely adequate or downright horrible. I tend to leans towards the former because I think it's lacking depth to be very useful. For every object, property, method and event there's information needed but not in the LR. Sometimes this includes bugs but more often than not, just clarification on what's changed.
Read More...
The Language Reference in RB is, depending upon who you ask, is either barely adequate or downright horrible. I tend to leans towards the former because I think it's lacking depth to be very useful. For every object, property, method and event there's information needed but not in the LR. Sometimes this includes bugs but more often than not, just clarification on what's changed.
Read More...
So What Can We Do For REALbasic?
12/12/07 18:03
I have my wish list for what RB can do for us. Now,
to be campy, what can we do to help REALbasic?
Read
More...
My Wish List For REALbasic In 2008
04/12/07 13:25
There's been an interesting discussion going on over
at Norman Palardy's blog. It started innocently
enough by Norman complaining that he's been
getting support and change requests for some of
his free and unsupported code that he has on his
site. The discussion has morphed into a life of
its own so I figured I'd start the "My Wish List
For REALbasic in 2008" thread and get some
additional feedback.
Read More...
Read More...
REALbasic and ActiveX
01/12/07 09:51
REALbasic is wonderful at cross-platform programming.
With a little elbow-grease it's possible to make very
nice Windows and Mac OS X applications. That's the
bread and butter of my business.
I have one client, however, that has had me working on a commercial VB6 application for five years. Since we know that someday VB6 will not be adequate for our needs we're looking for the 'next' development environment. .NET is the easy answer but since I have a lot invested in RB so I thought that if I can get them halfway to cross-platform that would be a win-win for everyone. Read More...
I have one client, however, that has had me working on a commercial VB6 application for five years. Since we know that someday VB6 will not be adequate for our needs we're looking for the 'next' development environment. .NET is the easy answer but since I have a lot invested in RB so I thought that if I can get them halfway to cross-platform that would be a win-win for everyone. Read More...
The State of Visual Basic 6 to REALbasic Conversion
05/11/07 11:50
Visual Basic 6 is arguably the most common
development language on the planet. It's low barrier
to entry and easy-of-use and its extensibility make
it ideal for many non-programmers to make a 'working'
application that does exactly what they want.
VB6 is no longer supported by Microsoft. This is forcing many developers into the .NET environment which is not as easy to use and many would argue that the language is no longer 'basic'. So what are companies that have dozens of VB6 applications to do? Read More...
VB6 is no longer supported by Microsoft. This is forcing many developers into the .NET environment which is not as easy to use and many would argue that the language is no longer 'basic'. So what are companies that have dozens of VB6 applications to do? Read More...
REALbasic Alternatives
30/10/07 16:29
Every three months or so, usually after a new
REALbasic release, the forum will inevitably have an
“RB Sucks Because of <<insert some bug or
missing feature here>>” thread. The poster will
be outraged that the engineers have allowed this bug
to occur and berate the beta testers for not having
caught it in beta.
What ensues in the thread usually boils down to this by follow-up posters: Read More...
What ensues in the thread usually boils down to this by follow-up posters: Read More...
Is REALbasic The Rodney Dangerfield of Software?
17/10/07 20:50
Wow. REAL Software does a good thing and people do
nothing but give them grief over it. In their monthly
newsletter, REAL said they spent a whole week in
September doing bug fixes. A post in the NUG list then
proceeds to give them crap about it. Is REAL
Software the Rodney Dangerfield of the software
industry getting, "No respect"?
Read More...
Read More...
If You Had One Thing to Teach a New RB User What Would it Be?
04/10/07 16:49
Our
new developer is starting soon and I'm in the let's
hurry up and gather as much information stage. I've
purchased the relevant books and gathered up the old
issues of RB Developer magazine. I've even put
together the care package of essential plugins and
tools. So now what? Read
More...
Bindings Deprecated and RB3D OpenSource?
20/09/07 14:53
REALbasic
engineers have said on the NUG that they are
deprecating bindings and
wish to open source RB3D.
I think this is good for RB in the long
run. Read
More...
REALbasic Wiki Thoughts
19/09/07 15:04
There has been considerable talk on the REALbasic
forums (link) about the possibilities of
an RB Wiki. I think it has loads of
possibilities but people have to look at the
drawbacks and from REAL Software's perspective.
First, a little history.
There was a wiki, appropriately named 'RBwiki' a while back. I believe it was created just before REAL World 2006 and started with much fanfare and a lot of promises by volunteers to keep it up-to-date. A large contributor of the wiki was Thomas Templeton who used it to distribute the RBProjectTool that allowed people to use source code and version control systems with RB (before the rbvcp format was introduced). It was a tool that allowed RB users to read and write between RB binary source code files and text files for use with Subversion and CVS and the like. REAL World 2006 was where REAL Software announced the version control format and Thomas and the REAL engineers sat down and compared notes. I think it safe to say that todays rbvcp format is a direct result of the collaboration. That also meant that the interest in the RBProjectTool died rather quickly. In about a year, the wiki was dead - no one wanted to keep it up to date. Read More...
There was a wiki, appropriately named 'RBwiki' a while back. I believe it was created just before REAL World 2006 and started with much fanfare and a lot of promises by volunteers to keep it up-to-date. A large contributor of the wiki was Thomas Templeton who used it to distribute the RBProjectTool that allowed people to use source code and version control systems with RB (before the rbvcp format was introduced). It was a tool that allowed RB users to read and write between RB binary source code files and text files for use with Subversion and CVS and the like. REAL World 2006 was where REAL Software announced the version control format and Thomas and the REAL engineers sat down and compared notes. I think it safe to say that todays rbvcp format is a direct result of the collaboration. That also meant that the interest in the RBProjectTool died rather quickly. In about a year, the wiki was dead - no one wanted to keep it up to date. Read More...
Welcome to the BKeeney Briefs Blog
01/09/07 13:06
Greetings and salutations! My name is Bob Keeney and
I'm the Vice-President of BKeeney Software Inc. This
blog was started after RBDeveloper magazine agreed
to publish a BKeeney Brief's column on a regular
basis. This is a very cool thing and I'm happy
to do it. I've always enjoyed writing and did a
lot of writing for various Mac user groups back
in the day. On a regular basis we'll talk about
being a developer and what it's like to make a
living as a developer. Read
More...